Key points
- The EEOC states that people who are not employed by the employer, such as independent contractors, are not covered by the federal laws it enforces.[1]
- Under N.Y. Exec. Law § 296-d, an employer may be liable to a contractor, subcontractor, vendor or consultant who is subjected to an unlawful discriminatory practice in the employer's workplace, if the employer knew or should have known and failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.[2]
- The New York City Human Rights Law states that its protections relating to employees apply to interns, freelancers and independent contractors.[3]
- New York's whistleblower statute, Labor Law § 740, defines "employee" to include natural persons working as independent contractors in furtherance of the employer's business who are not themselves employers.[4]
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981, a federal race discrimination statute, is written in terms of the right to make and enforce contracts and has no minimum number of employees.[5][6]
Whether an independent contractor, freelancer or gig worker is protected from discrimination and harassment in New York depends on which layer of law applies. The EEOC states that independent contractors are not covered by the federal laws it enforces.[1] The New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) each have a provision that reaches people who are not employees.[2][3]
The provisions quoted in this guide do not use the word "gig". What matters is whether a worker fits the words each statute does use, such as "employee", "non-employee", "freelancer" or "independent contractor". This guide does not cover the separate question of whether a worker labeled a contractor is legally an employee; that is a different body of law with its own tests.
How do the three layers compare?
| Layer | What the law says about non-employees | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Federal (Title VII and the other laws the EEOC enforces) | The EEOC states that people who are not employed by the employer, such as independent contractors, are not covered. | [1] |
| Federal (42 U.S.C. § 1981, race) | Protects the right to make and enforce contracts, including their performance and termination; no employee-count threshold. | [5][6] |
| New York State (NYSHRL, Exec. Law § 296-d) | An employer may not permit unlawful discrimination against non-employees in its workplace, and may be liable to contractors, subcontractors, vendors, consultants and their employees. | [2] |
| New York City (NYCHRL, Admin. Code § 8-107(23)) | The protections relating to employees apply to interns, freelancers and independent contractors. | [3] |
| New York State (Labor Law § 740, whistleblowing) | "Employee" includes natural persons working as independent contractors in furtherance of the employer's business who are not themselves employers. | [4] |
What does federal law cover?
Title VII applies to an "employer" with 15 or more employees, and its prohibitions are framed around employment.[7][8] The EEOC's statement that independent contractors are not covered is about the laws that agency enforces.[1]
One federal statute is framed differently. Section 1981 gives all persons the same right "to make and enforce contracts" as is enjoyed by white citizens, and defines that phrase to include the making, performance, modification and termination of contracts and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms and conditions of the contractual relationship.[5] Its text is about race, and it contains no minimum number of employees.[5][6] A § 1981 claim does not require an EEOC charge first, and filing an EEOC charge does not pause the § 1981 time limit.[9] A plaintiff under § 1981 has to plead and prove that, but for race, the loss of a legally protected right would not have happened.[10] The guide to Title VII in New York covers the federal baseline.
What does New York State law provide?
Executive Law § 296-d: non-employees in the workplace
Under the NYSHRL, it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to permit unlawful discrimination against non-employees in its workplace.[2] The statute says an employer may be held liable to a non-employee who is "a contractor, subcontractor, vendor, consultant or other person providing services pursuant to a contract in the workplace", or who is an employee of such a person.[2]
The section sets conditions. Reading its text, a non-employee's claim against the business involves these points:
- The person was providing services under a contract in the workplace, or was employed by someone who was.[2]
- The person was subjected to an unlawful discriminatory practice in the employer's workplace.[2]
- The employer, its agents or its supervisors knew or should have known.[2]
- The employer failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.[2]
In reviewing these cases, the statute directs that the extent of the employer's control, and any other legal responsibility the employer may have, over the conduct of the person who engaged in the discriminatory practice be considered.[2]
Section 296-d has changed since it was enacted. When it was added in 2018 it covered only sexual harassment of non-employees.[11] A 2019 amendment widened it to every unlawful discriminatory practice.[11] That amendment took effect on the sixtieth day after the act became law, a date the Appellate Division, Second Department, has given as October 11, 2019.[12] A description of § 296-d as a sexual harassment provision reflects the 2018 version.
Two more points about the section's reach. First, § 296-d protects non-employee workers; by its text it does not itself say that an employer is liable when a customer harasses an employee.[2] That situation is covered in the guide to harassment by customers, clients and vendors. Second, because the State law covers all employers within the state, § 296-d has no small-business exception written into the definition of "employer".[13]
What State guidance tells contractors and host businesses
New York State's sexual harassment guidance addresses a worker employed by a contractor and placed at another business's site. It says both the worker's own employer and the business that operates the worksite are required to provide a harassment-free workplace, and that the worker should report the conduct to both.[14]
The same guidance says employers are not required to provide their sexual harassment prevention policy to independent contractors, vendors or consultants, but that under the NYSHRL the employer is responsible and can be liable for the actions of these workers while in its workplace.[15] The policy and training guide explains what employers owe their own employees.
Whistleblower protection under Labor Law § 740
New York State's whistleblower law defines "employee" as an individual who performs services for and under the control and direction of an employer for wages or other remuneration, and expressly includes former employees and natural persons employed as independent contractors to carry out work in furtherance of an employer's business enterprise who are not themselves employers.[4] Former employees and independent contractors were added to that definition by Chapter 522 of the Laws of 2021.[16] The statute protects disclosing, or threatening to disclose, to a supervisor or public body an employer activity, policy or practice the person reasonably believes violates a law, rule or regulation.[17] It applies to any employer with one or more employees.[18] The guide to Labor Law § 740 has the full rules.
What does New York City law provide?
The NYCHRL says in one sentence: "The protections of this chapter relating to employees apply to interns, freelancers and independent contractors."[3] The words "freelancers and independent contractors" were added by Local Law 172 of 2019, and the NYC Commission on Human Rights gives January 11, 2020, as that local law's effective date.[3][19]
Several related City rules matter to contractors:
- Counting to four. For most of its employment provisions, the City law does not apply to an employer with fewer than four persons in its employ at all times during a period that starts twelve months before the discriminatory practice began.[20] Independent contractors working in furtherance of the employer's business are counted as persons in its employ.[21]
- Gender-based harassment. A claim of gender-based harassment can be brought against any employer in New York City, including one with fewer than four persons in its employ.[22]
- Retaliation. The City law's retaliation provision protects "any person" who opposed a forbidden practice, filed a complaint or took the other listed steps.[23]
- When the wrongdoer is a contractor. Under the City law, an employer is liable for an unlawful discriminatory practice committed by a person employed as an independent contractor (other than an agent of the employer) to carry out work in furtherance of its business only where the conduct was committed in the course of that employment and the employer had actual knowledge of it and acquiesced.[24][25]
The overview of the City Human Rights Law explains who and where the law reaches.
Where and when can a contractor bring a claim?
| Claim | Forum | Time limit |
|---|---|---|
| NYSHRL (including § 296-d) | State Division of Human Rights | Three years after the alleged practice.[26] |
| NYSHRL | Court | Three years.[27] |
| NYCHRL | NYC Commission on Human Rights | One year; three years for a claim of gender-based harassment.[28][29] |
| NYCHRL | Court | Three years.[30] |
| Labor Law § 740 | Court | Two years after the retaliatory action.[31] |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (claims made possible by the 1991 amendments) | Court | Four years.[32] |
Under both the State and the City law, a person has a cause of action in court unless the person has filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights or the NYC Commission on Human Rights; each statute then lists its own exceptions.[33][34] See the guides to choosing among the agencies and court and to claim deadlines.
What is not settled by the statutes' text
Some questions are not answered by the words of these statutes, and this guide does not answer them:
- How § 296-d's phrase "in the workplace" applies to a contractor who works remotely or through an app. The statute speaks of the employer's "workplace" and of services provided "in the workplace".[2] The guide to remote work and online harassment covers related questions for employees.
- Whether a given worker is correctly classified as a contractor in the first place.
- Payment disputes, such as late or unpaid invoices, which are outside the four subjects of this library.
Practical points for contractors and the businesses that hire them
If you are a contractor, keep your contract, statements of work and invoices together with dated notes of what happened, who was involved and whom you told. If you reported the conduct, note when and to whom, including anyone at the client business. For a fuller explanation of which workers each law reaches, see who is protected: employees, contractors and interns.
If you run a business, treat a complaint from a contractor, vendor or consultant the way you would treat one from an employee: record it, look into it promptly and act on what you find. Under the State law, § 296-d turns on whether the employer took immediate and appropriate corrective action once it knew or should have known.[2] The guide for managers and small employers collects the duties that apply to every New York employer.
Common questions
Can an independent contractor file a discrimination claim in New York?
New York State and New York City law each have a provision that reaches independent contractors. N.Y. Exec. Law § 296-d makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to permit unlawful discrimination against non-employees in its workplace, and names contractors, subcontractors, vendors and consultants.[2] In New York City, the Human Rights Law's employee protections apply to freelancers and independent contractors.[3] The EEOC, by contrast, states that independent contractors are not covered by the federal laws it enforces.[1]
I am a 1099 worker being sexually harassed at a client's office. Who is responsible?
Under the New York State Human Rights Law, the business whose workplace it is may be liable to you if it, its agents or its supervisors knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.[2] The extent of that business's control over the person who harassed you is part of the analysis.[2] If you work for a contracting company, State guidance says both your own employer and the worksite business are responsible.[14]
Does a company have to give contractors its sexual harassment policy and training?
Under State guidance, no. New York State says employers are not required to provide their sexual harassment prevention policy to independent contractors, vendors or consultants, because those individuals are not the employer's employees. The same guidance adds that under the New York State Human Rights Law the employer is responsible and can be liable for the actions of these workers while in its workplace.[15]
Are independent contractors protected from whistleblower retaliation?
Under New York State Labor Law § 740, yes, if they fit the definition. The statute's definition of "employee" includes natural persons employed as independent contractors to carry out work in furtherance of an employer's business enterprise who are not themselves employers.[4] A § 740 civil action has a two-year time limit, counted from the retaliatory action.[31]
Do contractors count toward New York City's four-person threshold?
Yes. For most of its employment provisions, the City Human Rights Law does not apply to an employer with fewer than four persons in its employ at all times during the period the law defines.[20] In counting, natural persons working as independent contractors in furtherance of the employer's business enterprise are counted as persons in its employ.[21]
Sources
- EEOC, "How Do You Count the Number of Employees an Employer Has?" — U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 296-d — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(23); Local Law 172 of 2019. — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(1)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a)–(b) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 421 U.S. 454, 460 (1975) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 421 U.S. 454, 460–61 (1975) — Library of Congress, United States Reports
- Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media, 589 U.S. 327 (2020) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- L. 2018, ch. 57, pt. KK, subpt. F, §§ 1, 3; L. 2019, ch. 160, §§ 4, 16(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Golston-Green v. City of New York, 184 A.D.3d 24, n.3 (2d Dep't 2020); L. 2019, ch. 160, § 16(b) — New York State Unified Court System
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(5) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- NYS, *Combating Workplace Sexual Harassment FAQs*, Non-Employees in a Workplace Q2 — State of New York
- NYS, *Combating Workplace Sexual Harassment FAQs*, Policy Q2, Q4 — State of New York
- L. 2021, ch. 522, § 1 (S.4394-A), amending N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(1)(a), (1)(e), (4)(c) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(2)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(1)(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- NYC Commission on Human Rights, "Amendments" (page read 5 Oct. 2026) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 ("Employer"). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 ("Employer"), cl. (i). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 ("Employer"); Local Law 98 of 2018. — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(7) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(13)(c). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(13)(c) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(5) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293, 307 (1983); N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(2) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-109(e). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-109(e); Local Law 100 of 2018. — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-502(d). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(4)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a); Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 541 U.S. 369, 382 (2004) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1), (f)(1); N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(1), (9); N.Y.C. Admin. Code §§ 8-109(a), 8-502(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(9); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-502(a)-(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York