Key points
- Under the federal ADA, a disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having one.[1]
- The New York State Human Rights Law covers an impairment that prevents the exercise of a normal bodily function or is demonstrable by medically accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques; it has no "substantially limits" requirement.[2]
- The New York City Human Rights Law defines disability as any physical, medical, mental or psychological impairment, or a history or record of one.[3]
- The State Division of Human Rights' regulation says the State definition covers many conditions that have been found not to be disabilities under the ADA.[4]
- Under the ADA, the helpful effects of medication and other mitigating measures are ignored when deciding whether an impairment is substantially limiting, with an exception for ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses.[5]
Whether a health condition counts as a "disability" at work depends on which law is being applied. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) asks whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity.[1] The New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) define disability by the impairment itself, without that test.[2][3] Each definition has to be checked separately.
The three definitions side by side
| Federal (ADA) | New York State (NYSHRL) | New York City (NYCHRL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core definition | A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.[1] | A physical, mental or medical impairment, resulting from anatomical, physiological, genetic or neurological conditions, which prevents the exercise of a normal bodily function or is demonstrable by medically accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques.[2] | Any physical, medical, mental or psychological impairment.[3] |
| Past conditions | A record of such an impairment.[1] | A record of such an impairment.[2] | A history or record of such impairment.[3] |
| Perceived conditions | Being regarded as having an impairment, except one that is transitory and minor.[6] | A condition regarded by others as such an impairment.[2] | The employment provision covers "actual or perceived" disability.[7] |
| Is ability to do the job part of the definition? | It is a separate question: the ADA protects a "qualified individual," meaning a person who can perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation.[8] | Yes. In employment, the term is limited to disabilities that, with reasonable accommodations, do not prevent the person from performing the job in a reasonable manner.[2] | No. The Court of Appeals has said the City definition does not include reasonable accommodation or the ability to perform a job, and is framed solely in terms of impairments.[9] Under the NYCHRL, inability to satisfy the essential requisites of the job even with accommodation is an affirmative defense.[10] |
What counts under the federal ADA?
The ADA's first prong has three parts: an impairment, a major life activity, and a substantial limit. The statute's list of major life activities is not exhaustive. It includes caring for oneself, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating and working, and it also includes the operation of major bodily functions such as the immune, digestive, neurological, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine and reproductive systems.[11]
Congress amended the ADA in 2008. Since January 1, 2009, the statute has directed that the definition of disability be construed in favor of broad coverage, to the maximum extent its terms permit.[12] The amended ADA and the EEOC's regulation under it set several rules:
- Under the ADA regulation, an impairment need not prevent, or significantly or severely restrict, a major life activity to be substantially limiting, although not every impairment is a disability.[13]
- Under the ADA, the helpful effects of medication, equipment, hearing aids, prosthetics, assistive technology and learned behavioral changes are ignored. The exception is ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses.[5]
- Under the ADA, an impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.[14]
- The ADA regulation says it should easily be concluded that certain impairments are substantially limiting, including deafness, blindness, intellectual disability, autism, cancer, cerebral palsy, diabetes, epilepsy, HIV infection, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder.[15]
A separate rule applies to people who rely on "working" as the affected activity. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers New York, held in 2020 that under the ADA the inability to perform a single, particular job is not a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working, and that the 2008 amendments did not change that.[16] The same condition may still limit a different major life activity on the ADA's list.[11]
"Regarded as" disabled under the ADA
A person is "regarded as" disabled under the ADA when an employer takes a prohibited action because of an actual or perceived impairment, whether or not the impairment limits a major life activity. This prong does not apply to impairments that are transitory and minor, and the ADA defines "transitory" as an actual or expected duration of six months or less.[6] That six-month line is sometimes read as a rule that short-term conditions are never ADA disabilities. The EEOC's ADA regulation says otherwise for the "actual disability" and "record of" prongs: the effects of an impairment lasting or expected to last fewer than six months can be substantially limiting.[17] The ADA also provides that an employer need not provide a reasonable accommodation to a person who meets the definition solely under the "regarded as" prong.[18]
What the ADA leaves out
The ADA states that "disability" does not include compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current illegal use of drugs.[19] A person currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs is not a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA when the employer acts on the basis of that use, but the exclusion does not apply to someone who has completed supervised rehabilitation and is no longer using.[20]
What counts under the New York State Human Rights Law?
The NYSHRL definition has two alternative routes: an impairment that prevents the exercise of a normal bodily function, or one that is demonstrable by medically accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques.[2] In 1985 the Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, read the NYSHRL to cover a range of conditions, from the loss of a bodily function to "merely diagnosable medical anomalies."[21] In 1998 the Second Circuit applied that reading to hold that a plaintiff's condition was a disability under the NYSHRL, describing the State definition as broader than the ADA's.[21] That decision predates the 2008 amendments to the ADA.[12]
The State definition has limits of its own:
- A medical impairment is needed. The Court of Appeals rejected NYSHRL claims by airline employees who failed a weight standard, because they had not shown a medical impairment restricting a normal bodily function.[7]
- Job performance is built in. In the NYSHRL's employment provisions, the term covers only disabilities that, with reasonable accommodations, do not prevent the person from performing the job in a reasonable manner.[2] The State regulation adds that reasonable performance is not perfect performance or performance unaffected by the disability.[22]
Several related protections sit beside the NYSHRL definition. Pregnancy-related conditions are treated as temporary disabilities under the NYSHRL.[23] Under the State Cannabis Law, being a certified medical cannabis patient is deemed to be having a disability under the NYSHRL.[24] The NYSHRL separately prohibits employment discrimination because of predisposing genetic characteristics.[25] The State regulation treats alcoholism and drug addiction as diseases and protects a recovered or recovering person, but not a person currently using drugs illegally.[26]
What counts under the New York City Human Rights Law?
The NYCHRL definition reads: any physical, medical, mental or psychological impairment, or a history or record of one, where "impairment" means an impairment of any system of the body or a mental or psychological impairment.[3] The NYC Commission on Human Rights, which enforces the NYCHRL, says in its December 2025 guidance that temporary and short-term injuries as well as chronic conditions may qualify, even if the condition does not substantially limit a major life activity.[27][28]
The NYCHRL definition has an express limit. For alcoholism, drug addiction or other substance abuse, the City definition applies only to a person who is recovering or has recovered and currently is free of such abuse.[29] The NYCHRL also lists height and weight as protected categories in employment, separate from disability.[7]
How have courts compared the three definitions?
The Second Circuit has written that disability is more broadly defined under the NYSHRL and the NYCHRL than under the ADA.[30] In 2009 the Appellate Division, First Department, put the order this way: "The State HRL provides protections broader than the ADA; and the City HRL is broader still."[30] The State Division of Human Rights' regulation makes the same comparison between the State definition and federal law.[4] The ADA itself does not limit a State or local law that gives equal or greater protection.[31]
Having a disability is the first question, not the last. Each law then asks whether the person could do the job with a reasonable accommodation and whether the employer acted because of the disability.[8][2][10] Those questions are covered in reasonable accommodation and how discrimination is proved.
For specific kinds of conditions, see the pages on mental health conditions, temporary injuries and short-term conditions, addiction, alcoholism and medical cannabis and pregnancy accommodations. If an employer acted on a mistaken belief about your health, or because of a family member's condition, see perceived disability and association discrimination. To check whether each law applies to your employer at all, see which employers are covered, and for the wider picture return to the disability discrimination overview.
Common questions
Is a temporary injury, such as a broken leg, a disability in New York?
It can be. The EEOC's ADA regulation says the effects of an impairment lasting or expected to last fewer than six months can be substantially limiting.[17] The New York State regulation protects a current employee with a temporary disability who will be able to do the job after a reasonable time for recovery.[32] The NYC Commission on Human Rights says temporary and short-term injuries may qualify under the City Human Rights Law.[27]
My condition is controlled by medication. Am I still covered?
Under the federal ADA, whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity is decided without regard to the helpful effects of mitigating measures such as medication.[5] An impairment that is episodic or in remission is an ADA disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.[14] The NYC Commission on Human Rights says a condition can meet the City Human Rights Law definition even if, when treated, it leaves the person without limitation.[27]
Do depression, anxiety or PTSD count as disabilities?
The EEOC's ADA regulation says it should easily be concluded that major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and schizophrenia substantially limit brain function.[15] The New York State Human Rights Law definition includes mental impairments, and the New York City Human Rights Law definition includes any mental or psychological impairment.[2][3]
Can a condition count if I have a diagnosis but no symptoms yet?
Under the New York State Human Rights Law, the Court of Appeals held in 1985 that the definition reaches conditions that are merely diagnosable medical anomalies which may lead to more serious conditions in the future.[21] Under the federal ADA, the question is whether the impairment substantially limits a major life activity, which includes the operation of a major bodily function.[1][11]
Am I protected if my employer wrongly believes I have a disability?
The federal ADA covers a person who is regarded as having an impairment, whether or not the impairment limits a major life activity, unless the impairment is transitory and minor.[6] The New York State Human Rights Law covers a condition regarded by others as an impairment.[2] The New York City Human Rights Law reaches discrimination because of an actual or perceived disability.[7] Under the ADA, a person covered only as regarded as disabled is not owed a reasonable accommodation.[18]
Sources
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(21) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 (definition of "Disability") — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- 9 NYCRR § 466.11(c)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(E)(i)–(ii) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(3)(A)–(B) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- State Div. of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp., 65 N.Y.2d 213, 219 (1985); Matter of Delta Air Lines v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 91 N.Y.2d 65, 72–73 (1997); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(1)(a) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A., 22 N.Y.3d 881, 885 (2013) — static.case.law
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(15)(b); Jacobsen v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 22 N.Y.3d 824, 845 (2014) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(A)–(B) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(A); Pub. L. 110-325 (effective Jan. 1, 2009) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(1)(ii) — Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
- 42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(D) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(3)(iii) — Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
- Woolf v. Strada, 949 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2020) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(1)(ix) — Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
- 42 U.S.C. § 12201(h); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(4) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 12211(b) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 12114(a)–(b) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- State Div. of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp., 65 N.Y.2d 213, 219 (1985); Reeves v. Johnson Controls World Servs., Inc., 140 F.3d 144, 147, 155 (2d Cir. 1998) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- 9 NYCRR § 466.11(d)(1)(ii), (f)(3) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 292(21-f), 296(3)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Cannabis Law § 42(2) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 292(21-a), 296(1)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- 9 NYCRR § 466.11(h)(1), (2), (4) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- NYC Commission on Human Rights, Legal Enforcement Guidance on Discrimination on the Basis of Disability (Dec. 2025), § A(i) (pp. 6–9 of the PDF) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- NYC Commission on Human Rights, Legal Enforcement Guidance on Discrimination on the Basis of Disability (Dec. 2025), cover and contents (pp. 1–3) — City of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 (definition of "Disability", para. 2) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- Phillips v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 170, 176 (1st Dep't 2009); Jacobsen v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 22 N.Y.3d 824, 833–34 (2014); Weissman v. Dawn Joy Fashions, Inc., 214 F.3d 224, 233 (2d Cir. 2000) — static.case.law
- 42 U.S.C. § 12201(b), (d), (g) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 9 NYCRR § 466.11(i)(1)–(3) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School