Key points
- No formula appears in the statutes described here: under the State law, a court reviewing a Division of Human Rights mental-anguish award asks whether it was reasonably related to the wrongdoing, supported by the evidence, and how it compared with other awards for similar injuries.[1]
- Federal Title VII and ADA claims cap the combined total of certain compensatory damages and punitive damages at $50,000 to $300,000 per person, depending on the employer's size.[2][3][4]
- The New York State Human Rights Law states no dollar limit on compensatory damages, and the New York City Human Rights Law's court-action section sets no dollar cap on compensatory or punitive damages.[5][6]
- Under federal Title VII, back pay is reduced by what the person earned or could have earned with reasonable diligence.[7]
- The standards for punitive damages differ by layer, and punitive damages are not available against government employers under Title VII or the New York State Human Rights Law.[8][9][10]
No formula exists. Federal, New York State and New York City law list the kinds of relief a court or agency may order and put limits on some of them, but none assigns a dollar value to a claim.[7][5][6] Under the State law, when a court reviews a Division of Human Rights award for mental anguish, the Court of Appeals directs it to ask whether it was reasonably related to the wrongdoing, whether it was supported by the evidence, and how it compared with other awards for similar injuries.[1]
This page lists the legal factors that raise or limit recovery, each with its source. It gives no estimates, averages or ranges.
Which laws apply to the claim?
Three layers of law can apply to the same events. The first question is which of them covers the employer.
- Federal. Title VII covers an employer only if it has 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year.[11]
- New York State. The New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) covers all employers within the state.[12]
- New York City. For most employment provisions, the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) does not apply to an employer with fewer than four persons in its employ, but a claim of gender-based harassment can be brought against any employer.[13][14]
For race discrimination, a separate federal statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, has no employee-count threshold in its text.[15] See which employers are covered and the three layers of workplace law.
Is there a cap on damages?
Under federal Title VII and the ADA, yes, for some kinds of damages. The NYSHRL and the NYCHRL's court-action section state no dollar limit on compensatory damages.[2][5][6]
| Law | Dollar limit in the statute |
|---|---|
| Federal: Title VII and ADA | The combined total of punitive damages and compensatory damages for future pecuniary losses and non-pecuniary losses is capped per person at $50,000 (15 to 100 employees), $100,000 (101 to 200), $200,000 (201 to 500) or $300,000 (more than 500).[2][16][3] |
| Federal: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 | The caps limit damages awarded under the capped section, which says nothing in it limits the relief available under § 1981.[17] |
| New York State: NYSHRL | No dollar limit on compensatory damages is stated, and the statute sets no dollar cap on punitive damages in employment cases.[5][18] |
| New York City: NYCHRL (court action) | No dollar cap on compensatory or punitive damages, and damages are not scaled to employer size.[6] |
The federal cap does not cover everything. Back pay and interest on back pay are not "compensatory damages" under the capped section, and the Supreme Court has held that the cap does not apply to front pay.[16][19] In a federal jury trial, the court does not inform the jury of the caps.[20] Details are in the federal damages caps guide.
How much pay was lost, and for how long?
Lost pay depends on the facts of the job: what the person earned, when the pay stopped, and what happened afterward. The law adds limits.
- Under Title VII, back pay cannot accrue from a date more than two years before the EEOC charge was filed.[7]
- Front pay is money for lost compensation between judgment and reinstatement, or in place of reinstatement.[21]
See back pay, front pay and reinstatement.
Did the person look for other work?
Under federal Title VII, interim earnings, or amounts earnable with reasonable diligence, reduce the back pay otherwise allowable.[7] The Supreme Court has said that a Title VII claimant who refuses a job substantially equivalent to the one denied forfeits back pay.[22] These are federal rules; this guide does not state a separate State or City rule on the point.
What is the proof of emotional harm?
Under the NYSHRL, the Court of Appeals has held that mental injury may be proved by medical testimony where that is available, but that psychiatric or other medical treatment is not a precondition to recovery.[23] It may be proved by the complainant's own testimony, corroborated by the circumstances of the alleged misconduct.[23] A court reviewing a Division of Human Rights award asks whether the relief was reasonably related to the wrongdoing, whether the award was supported by evidence, and how it compared with other awards for similar injuries.[1]
Under the NYCHRL, courts have said that the severity and pervasiveness of harassment go to the scope of damages, not to whether the employer is liable.[24] The emotional distress damages guide goes deeper.
Are punitive damages available, and under what standard?
Each layer sets its own conditions for punitive damages.[8][18][10]
| Law | Standard or condition | Government employers |
|---|---|---|
| Federal: Title VII | The employee must show the employer acted with malice or with reckless indifference to federally protected rights.[8] An employer is not vicariously liable for punitive damages for managers' decisions that are contrary to its good-faith efforts to comply with Title VII.[25] | Punitive damages cannot be recovered against a government, government agency or political subdivision.[8] |
| New York State: NYSHRL | Available in cases of employment discrimination related to private employers, for claims accruing on or after October 11, 2019.[18] | Not available, because "private employer" excludes the State and local governments.[9] |
| New York City: NYCHRL | Available where the wrongdoer acted with willful or wanton negligence, or recklessness, or a conscious disregard of the rights of others or conduct so reckless as to amount to such disregard.[10] | Not stated in this guide. |
Under the NYCHRL, an employer held liable solely for the conduct of an employee or agent can offer proof of its prevention policies and record, and that proof is considered in mitigation of civil penalties and punitive damages.[26][27] See punitive damages in New York employment cases.
Which employer defenses can shrink the remedies?
Some defenses do not defeat a claim but limit what can be awarded on it.
- Same-decision defense (federal Title VII). If the employee proves a protected characteristic was a motivating factor but the employer proves it would have taken the same action anyway, the court may grant declaratory and injunctive relief and attorney's fees, but may not award damages or order reinstatement, hiring, promotion or payment.[28]
- Good-faith accommodation efforts (federal ADA). In a failure-to-accommodate case, compensatory and punitive damages may not be awarded where the employer demonstrates good-faith efforts, in consultation with the person with the disability, to identify and make a reasonable accommodation.[29]
Other defenses are covered in the guide to employer defenses.
Can attorney's fees be shifted to the other side?
Under Title VII, the NYSHRL and the NYCHRL, a court may in its discretion award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party.[30][31][32] See attorney's fee awards.
Where is the claim decided?
The forum affects both who decides and what can be ordered.
- State Division of Human Rights. After a hearing, the Commissioner may order hiring, reinstatement or upgrading with or without back pay, and may award compensatory damages.[33][5] The Division may also assess civil fines of up to $50,000, or up to $100,000 for a willful, wanton or malicious act, which are paid to the State.[34]
- NYC Commission on Human Rights. After a hearing, the Commission can order reinstatement, back pay and front pay, compensatory damages, and payment of the complainant's attorney's fees.[35] It may also impose a civil penalty of up to $125,000, or up to $250,000 for a willful, wanton or malicious act; civil penalties are paid into the City's general fund.[36][37]
- Court. In federal court, a party seeking compensatory or punitive damages under Title VII or the ADA may demand a jury.[38] In New York State court, issues of fact are tried by a jury, unless waived, in an action seeking a judgment for a sum of money only.[38]
The choice is hard to reverse: filing with the State Division or the City Commission generally bars a court suit on the same State or City claim.[39][6] Compare the forums in EEOC, State Division, City Commission or court and read election of remedies.
Is the claim under a different statute altogether?
Retaliation and whistleblower statutes carry their own remedy lists. New York State Labor Law § 740 allows reinstatement or front pay, lost wages and benefits, attorney's fees, a civil penalty of up to $10,000, and punitive damages if the violation was willful, malicious or wanton.[40] New York State Labor Law § 215 provides for liquidated damages of not more than $20,000, in addition to lost compensation, reinstatement or front pay, and attorneys' fees.[41]
See Labor Law § 740 and Labor Law § 215.
What else affects the amount a person keeps?
- Interest. Under the NYSHRL, the Court of Appeals has held that interest from the date of discrimination on a back pay award serves the law's purpose of making victims whole.[42]
- Taxes. Under federal tax guidance, the lost-wage part of a settlement is taxable wages, and emotional distress proceeds that do not originate from a physical injury or physical sickness are included in income.[43][44] See whether settlements are taxable.
- Timing. Under Title VII, back pay cannot accrue from a date more than two years before the EEOC charge was filed, so the filing date matters.[7] The deadlines guide lists the filing periods under each law.
Why past results and "average settlement" figures do not answer the question
Every factor above turns on facts that differ from one person to the next. The State-law review standard for Division mental-anguish awards itself looks to the evidence in the individual case.[1]
For that reason this guide publishes no typical, average or expected figures. Official agency totals, where they exist, are collected in New York workplace discrimination statistics; they are totals across many cases and say nothing about any single claim.
Whether to accept a settlement is the client's decision. New York's Statement of Client's Rights says a client is entitled to have their legitimate objectives respected by their attorney, including whether or not to settle the matter.[45]
Common questions
Is there a formula or calculator for what an employment claim is worth?
No. The statutes list categories of relief, such as back pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorney's fees, and set limits on some of them.[7][46][5][6] They do not assign dollar values. For emotional harm under the State law, the New York Court of Appeals directs a court reviewing a Division of Human Rights award to ask whether it was supported by the evidence and how it compared with other awards for similar injuries.[1] This guide gives no estimates.
Does the size of my employer matter?
It matters in two ways. First, coverage: federal Title VII reaches employers with 15 or more employees, the New York State Human Rights Law covers all employers, and the New York City Human Rights Law generally applies to employers with four or more persons.[11][12][13] Second, the federal cap on certain damages rises in four steps with the number of employees, from $50,000 to $300,000.[2]
Do the federal damages caps apply to my New York State or City claim?
The caps are in a federal statute and limit damages awarded under that section for Title VII and ADA claims.[2][3] The New York State Human Rights Law states no dollar limit on compensatory damages.[5] The New York City Human Rights Law's court-action section sets no dollar cap on compensatory or punitive damages and does not scale damages to employer size.[6]
Do I need medical records to recover for emotional distress?
Under the New York State Human Rights Law, the Court of Appeals has said mental injury may be proved by medical testimony where available, but psychiatric or other medical treatment is not a precondition to recovery; it may be proved by the complainant's own testimony, corroborated by the circumstances of the misconduct.[23] A court reviewing a Division award still asks whether it was supported by evidence.[1]
Does it matter whether I file with an agency or in court?
Yes. The remedies and the decision-maker differ by forum. At the State Division of Human Rights an Administrative Law Judge conducts the public hearing, while a party seeking compensatory or punitive damages under Title VII in federal court may demand a jury.[47][38] Filing with the State Division or the City Commission generally bars a later lawsuit on the same State or City claim.[39][6]
Who decides whether to accept a settlement?
The client. New York's Statement of Client's Rights says a client is entitled to have their legitimate objectives respected by their attorney, including whether or not to settle the matter.[45] The same statement says a client is entitled to be charged a reasonable fee and to have the lawyer explain at the outset how the fee will be computed.[45]
Sources
- Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 78 N.Y.2d 207, 218-219 (1991) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(3)(A)–(D) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. §§ 12117(a), 1981a(a)(2), (b)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(2) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(4)(c)(iii) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-502(a). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 292(38), 297(4)(c)(iv), 297(9) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Chauca v. Abraham, 30 N.Y.3d 325, 329, 333-334 (2017). — New York State Unified Court System
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(5) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 ("Employer"). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102 ("Employer"); Local Law 98 of 2018. — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 421 U.S. 454, 460 (1975) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(2)–(3) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(1), (b)(4) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(4)(c)(iv), (9); L. 2019, ch. 160, §§ 5, 16(b), (d) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Pollard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 532 U.S. 843, 848 (2001) — Library of Congress, United States Reports
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(c) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Pollard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 532 U.S. 843 (2001) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 231-232 (1982) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 78 N.Y.2d 207, 216 (1991) — CourtListener, Free Law Project
- Williams, 61 A.D.3d at 76; Mihalik, 715 F.3d at 113. — static.case.law
- Kolstad v. American Dental Association, 527 U.S. 526, 535, 545 (1999) — Library of Congress, United States Reports
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(13)(d)(1)-(2). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(13)(e). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(2)(B) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(3) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(10) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-502(g). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(4)(c)(i)–(ii) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(4)(c)(vi) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-120(a)(1), (2), (8)-(10). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-126(a). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-127(a). — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- N.Y. C.P.L.R. 4101; 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(a)-(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(9); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-502(a)-(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 740(5)(a)–(g) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y. Lab. Law § 215(2)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Matter of Aurecchione v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 98 N.Y.2d 21 (2002) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- IRS Publication 4345 (Rev. 9-2023), p. 2 — Internal Revenue Service
- IRS Publication 4345 (Rev. 9-2023), "Settlements — Taxability", p. 1 — Internal Revenue Service
- 22 NYCRR § 1210.1 — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y.S. Division of Human Rights, "Public Hearings"; N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(4)(a) — New York State Division of Human Rights