Key points
- Under federal law, a resignation is treated as a firing only if working conditions became so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to resign.[1]
- Under Title VII, back pay is reduced by what the person earned, or could have earned with reasonable diligence, in the meantime.[2]
- Under New York State law, a person who leaves a job voluntarily without good cause is disqualified from unemployment benefits until they have worked again and earned at least ten times their weekly benefit rate.[3]
- Federal, New York State and New York City law each prohibit retaliation against a person for opposing discrimination or filing a complaint, and federal law covers former employees as well.[4][5][6][7]
- The EEOC says opposing discrimination is not a license to neglect job duties, and that if an employee's protests make the employee ineffective in the job, the retaliation provisions do not shield the employee from appropriate discipline.[8]
None of the laws described on this page requires a person with a pending workplace complaint either to stay in the job or to leave it. The New York State Department of Labor describes New York as an at-will employment state in which an employee has the right to leave a job at any time without needing to defend or explain the decision.[9] Federal, New York State and New York City law attach different consequences to each choice in four areas: whether the job loss itself can be part of the claim, lost pay, unemployment benefits, and retaliation protection.
This guide sets out those consequences on each side. It does not recommend either course.
The two paths side by side
| Issue | If you stay | If you resign |
|---|---|---|
| Claim about losing the job | No job loss has occurred; claims concern the conduct and any other employer actions. | Federal law treats the resignation as a discharge only if the constructive discharge test is met.[1] |
| Lost pay | Wages continue. | Under Title VII, back pay is reduced by interim earnings or amounts earnable with reasonable diligence.[2] |
| Unemployment benefits (New York State) | The job and its wages continue. | A voluntary separation without good cause disqualifies the claimant until a re-earning requirement is met.[3] |
| Retaliation protection | Federal, State and City law prohibit retaliation for opposing discrimination or filing a complaint.[4][5][6] | Federal law covers former employees as well.[7] |
| Health coverage | Employer coverage continues on its usual terms. | New York State law gives a right to continue group coverage, on written request within a set period.[10] |
If you resign: when does the law treat it as a firing?
"Constructive discharge" is the legal term for a resignation that the law treats as a termination. Under federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court described the test in Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders: did working conditions become so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to resign?[1] The inquiry is objective.[1]
In a federal harassment case, the U.S. Supreme Court said a hostile-environment constructive discharge claim "entails something more" than a hostile work environment claim.[11] The employee has to show that the abusive working environment became so intolerable that resignation qualified as a fitting response.[11] Under the same federal decision, the employer may still raise its affirmative defense about reporting procedures unless the employee quit in reasonable response to an official act such as a humiliating demotion, an extreme cut in pay, or a transfer to unbearable working conditions.[11][12] The federal appeals court that covers New York describes constructive discharge as an employer intentionally creating a work atmosphere so intolerable that the employee is forced to quit involuntarily.[13]
New York's highest court has stated a similar test, borrowed from federal discrimination law, in a case that was not itself a discrimination case: the employer deliberately makes working conditions so intolerable that the employee is forced into an involuntary resignation, judged by whether a reasonable person in the employee's shoes would have felt compelled to resign.[14] The guide to constructive discharge in New York covers the doctrine in depth, including what the sources say about State and City law.
Timing when a resignation is part of the claim
In a federal constructive discharge claim, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the limitations period begins to run only after the employee resigns; the case concerned the 45-day counseling deadline for federal employees.[15] Separately, the EEOC says its time limits generally are not extended while a person tries to resolve a dispute through an internal grievance procedure, a union grievance, arbitration or mediation.[16] The guide to New York employment claim deadlines lists each period.
If you resign: what happens to a lost-pay claim?
Back pay is compensation for pay lost because of an unlawful act. Under Title VII, the federal statute says interim earnings, or amounts earnable with reasonable diligence, reduce the back pay otherwise allowable.[2] The U.S. Supreme Court has called this the claimant's "statutory obligation to minimize damages".[17]
The U.S. Supreme Court explained the limits of that duty in Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC. Under Title VII, a claimant need not go into another line of work, accept a demotion or take a demeaning position, but forfeits the right to back pay by refusing a job substantially equivalent to the one denied.[18] Absent special circumstances, rejecting an employer's unconditional offer of the job ends the accrual of back pay under that federal decision.[18]
These are federal rules, stated in Title VII and a U.S. Supreme Court decision applying it.[2][18] This page does not state a State or City rule on the point under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) or the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL). The guide to back pay, front pay and reinstatement covers remedies in more detail.
If you resign: unemployment benefits
Under New York State Labor Law § 593, a claimant who voluntarily separates without good cause is disqualified until they have worked again and earned at least ten times their weekly benefit rate.[3] The statute says a voluntary separation does not in itself disqualify a claimant if circumstances developed in the course of the employment that would have justified refusing the job in the first place, and it names "a compelling family reason" among the circumstances that may be good cause.[3]
The State statute does not list sexual harassment by name.[19] The Department of Labor's published interpretation index records Appeal Board rulings that being harassed by coworkers to such an extent that health is adversely affected may be good cause for leaving, and that discriminatory enforcement of a company rule is good cause.[20] Those entries do not establish that every resignation over harassment or discrimination qualifies. The guide to unemployment benefits after being fired or quitting covers the benefit rules, including what happens after a firing.
"Good cause" is a term in the New York State unemployment statute, and "constructive discharge" is a test from federal discrimination case law; they are separate standards.[3][1]
If you stay: retaliation protection
Federal, New York State and New York City law each prohibit retaliation, in different words.[4][5][6]
- Federal. Title VII makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee because the person opposed an unlawful practice or made a charge, testified, assisted or participated in an investigation, proceeding or hearing.[4] The employee has to show an action a reasonable employee would have found materially adverse, meaning it well might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge.[21]
- New York State. The NYSHRL makes it unlawful to retaliate against any person because they opposed a forbidden practice, filed a complaint, testified or assisted in a proceeding, or requested a reasonable accommodation.[5]
- New York City. The NYCHRL forbids retaliation "in any manner" for a list of protected acts that includes opposing a forbidden practice, filing a complaint and starting a civil action.[6] Under the City law, the retaliation need not result in an ultimate employment action or a materially adverse change; it has to be reasonably likely to deter a person from engaging in protected activity.[6]
Protection from retaliation is not immunity from ordinary management. The EEOC says opposition to perceived discrimination does not serve as a license to neglect job duties, and that if an employee's protests make the employee ineffective in the job, the retaliation provisions do not immunize the employee from appropriate discipline or discharge.[8] The guides on what workplace retaliation is and being placed on a performance plan after complaining go further.
Does retaliation protection end when the job ends?
Not under federal law. The U.S. Supreme Court held that Title VII's anti-retaliation provision covers former employees.[7] EEOC guidance lists post-employment examples: an unjustified, untruthful negative job reference, refusing to provide a reference, or informing a prospective employer about the person's earlier complaint.[22] See retaliation after you quit or are fired.
Other consequences of leaving
Health coverage, final wages and required notices follow their own rules when a job ends by resignation or termination. Under New York State Insurance Law § 3221(m), a group health insurance policy has to let an employee whose coverage ends because employment terminated continue coverage, on a written request made within the sixty days after the later of the termination date or the date notice of the right is sent.[10] The guide to final pay, health insurance and notices when a job ends covers these. If the employer offers a separation agreement, see severance agreements and releases.
Practical points on either path
- Keep a dated, factual record of what happens, kept somewhere other than an employer device or account.
- If you leave, keep a copy of your resignation letter and note the date you gave notice and your last day.
- If you stay, keep copies of your own performance reviews and commendations where you are permitted to have them.
- If you look for other work, keep a dated record of applications and offers.
- A doctor or counselor can document the effect of working conditions on health.
Common questions
If I quit because of harassment, do I lose my case?
Under federal law a resignation can still be treated as a discharge, which is called constructive discharge, but only when conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign, and in a federal harassment case the U.S. Supreme Court has said such a claim entails something more than a hostile work environment.[1][11]
Can I get unemployment benefits if I resign?
Under New York State Labor Law § 593, a voluntary separation without good cause disqualifies a claimant until they have worked again and earned at least ten times their weekly benefit rate. The statute does not list sexual harassment by name as good cause. A Department of Labor index records a ruling that harassment by coworkers to the extent health is adversely affected may be good cause.[3][19][20]
Am I still protected from retaliation after I leave?
Under federal law, yes. The U.S. Supreme Court held that Title VII's anti-retaliation provision covers former employees, in a case about a negative job reference. EEOC guidance gives as examples an unjustified, untruthful negative reference, refusing to give a reference, or telling a prospective employer about the person's earlier complaint.[7][22]
Do I have to look for another job after I leave?
For a federal Title VII back-pay claim, the statute reduces back pay by interim earnings or amounts earnable with reasonable diligence. The U.S. Supreme Court has said a claimant need not go into another line of work, accept a demotion or take a demeaning position, but forfeits back pay by refusing a job substantially equivalent to the one denied.[2][18]
Does staying at work mean the conduct was not serious enough?
The federal constructive discharge test is about resignations: it asks, objectively, whether conditions became so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to resign. Whether the conduct itself was unlawful is a separate question, decided under the harassment and discrimination standards of each law, which the other guides in this library set out.[1]
Sources
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 141 (2004) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(1) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Labor Law § 593(1)(a)-(b) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(7) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(7) — New York City Commission on Human Rights
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Retaliation § II.A.2.b (2016) — U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- N.Y.S. Department of Labor, "Wages and Hours Frequently Asked Questions" — "Can you fire an employee without due cause?" (page read Oct. 5, 2026) — New York State Department of Labor
- N.Y. Ins. Law § 3221(m)(1), (2)(A), (4)(A) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129 (2004) (syllabus) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 134 (2004) — Library of Congress, United States Reports
- Petrosino v. Bell Atlantic, 385 F.3d 210, 229 (2d Cir. 2004) — static.case.law
- Morris v. Schroder Capital Mgt. Intl., 7 N.Y.3d 616, 621-622 (2006) — New York State Unified Court System
- Green v. Brennan, 578 U.S. 547 (2016) (No. 14-613, decided May 23, 2016) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- EEOC, "Time Limits For Filing A Charge" — U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219 (1982) (syllabus) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 231-232 (1982) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- N.Y. Labor Law § 593(1)(a) — New York State Senate, Laws of New York
- NYS Dep't of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Interpretation Index, Section 1600 (Voluntary Separation), Index 1650 (Grievance and objections) — New York State Department of Labor
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 (2006) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- EEOC, Enforcement Guidance on Retaliation and Related Issues, No. 915.004, § II.A.3 (Aug. 25, 2016) — U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission